Isn’t it?
Recently, I read an article (Books face extinction as schools go high-tech) about a school in Massachusetts that is embarking on a movement from textbook to computer-based class content. We can’t ignore the usefulness of pervasive online course management systems like Moodle and Angel, or the various other technologically-based instructional systems that aid educators in the most noble of tasks. They are helpful and make a lot of classroom activities much easier. Yet, while is clear that many traditional textbooks are situated around a teacher-centered view of learning, one where the teacher is mediator between the students and knowledge, I hesitate to fully embrace the idea that:
“It’s not just in [students] normal lifestyle to read from a book.”Books face extinction as schools go high-tech
My traditional side screams, “Wait a minute! Why not?!” My techno-sympathetic side calmly says, “Well, what IS in their normal lifestyle and how can we harness that?” The article discusses the fact that going digital enabled the particular school to offer more electives, which is a wonderful thing. It also mentions the federal stimulus package that enables Massachusetts’ schools to purchase new technologies with an aim at increasing student achievement, which is another plus. My question is: What are we losing when we go all-digital? Is it realistic to want students to appreciate printed media that might not be around for much longer anyway? Where do our personal nostalgias become sacrificed for the greater good of the students? What gets lost in the process?

